ram said:
I am sure most people in NJ making over $140K do not consider themselves to be beyond middle class.
NY is interesting. The cost of living upstate is so different than in the NYC metro, The range in NY certainly does not apply to NYC metro.
There are some high wage earners who spend most of what they earn, but I would still classify them as upper class. But, in general, this is probably a better definition than one based on average/median income levels.sarahzm said:
Mario Cuomo was once asked to define the middle class and his answer was that if you own your own home you are middle class. I always thought that the definition upper class is that you have enough wealth to live off the income from your assets rather than your wages.
sac said:
It just goes to show that bank acccount balances and salary levels don't tell the whole story.
Interesting reading and discussion - thanks for posting. Not sure how to "follow" in the new MOL, so posting to do so...
qrysdonnell said:
I always assume that if anyone insists that they're not 'rich' and are still in the middle class they're probably not. It's sort of like hipsters. Everyone knows you are one on sight, but you'll never admit it.
20 year old me would think 44 year old me is filthy stinking rich. Obama and the IRS definitely think I'm rich. In reality I have less disposable income now than I did when I was fresh out of college. The math for me retiring comfortably at a reasonable age is terrible. There are people who I consider rich that make less money than I do. Not sure what the formula is for rich but it needs to involve more than just ones paycheck. Our household income is way past what I thought I'd need at this point in my life to be "all set" but I still sometimes come in the back door of my house because I don't want to see the bills the mail lady pushed though the slot..
We tend to take on an increasing amount of financial responsibility, pushing us from comfortable to struggling.
This is why disposable income is less in middle age than when we're in our 20's. In our 20's, we want and expect less.
20 year old you probably didn't have a mortgage, student loan, medical expenses, insurance premiums, child care costs, the level of taxes you presently pay, etc. Our fiscal responsibilities at age 20 are often very different from our fiscal responsibilities at age 44. Add on inflation and the income that seemed extremely generous at age 20 probably doesn't cover nearly as much now as it would have then.
Or the bars got more expensive.
joan_crystal said:
20 year old you probably didn't have a mortgage, student loan, medical expenses, insurance premiums, child care costs, the level of taxes you presently pay, etc. Our fiscal responsibilities at age 20 are often very different from our fiscal responsibilities at age 44. Add on inflation and the income that seemed extremely generous at age 20 probably doesn't cover nearly as much now as it would have then.
As a Sociology grad student specializing in Class Analysis and Historical Change (yes, the actual name of my program), I spent more time than most reading articles and books on class, analyzing data on class, and just thinking about the whole class thing.
I have two basic take-aways from all that class analysis:
There are no commonly accepted measures or definitions of what a class is, let alone which types of classes exist in our society or in other societies. Some measure class solely by income, others by moral values, or job description, or position with regards to control of their work pace/product. But there is no general rule of thumb that even a majority of social scientists agree upon.
In a rapidly changing economy and society, it has become harder and harder to draw class boundary lines. In some industries, line workers need to have significant technical and mathematical training--are they still working class? How about "new media" tech workers who use computers and computer programs but basically gin out mass production products working at long benches in converted manufacturing buildings? Are they in the technical class even though they may be paid piece rates?
Barbara Ehrenreich tried to define the "New Class" in the 1980's as a "professional-managerial" class that had university degrees, managerial control, etc but while this was influential it did not have adequate definitive value to become a real change in how folks think about class. But it did point out many of the problems with the more standard understandings of class.
Whenever I hear some politician pontificating about protecting our middle class I immediately look to see who he wants to benefit at the expense of someone else. And I try to grab my wallet before he gets his hands on it.
http://www.businessinsider.com/middle-class-in-every-us-state-2015-4
Related: Pew Trust -- http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2015/3/19/the-shrinking-middle-class-mapped-state-by-state